<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Are we still a “uniting” church or have we already united?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://journeyonline.com.au/opinion/still-uniting-church-already-united/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://journeyonline.com.au/opinion/still-uniting-church-already-united/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rev. Devadosan Sugirtharaj		</title>
		<link>https://journeyonline.com.au/opinion/still-uniting-church-already-united/#comment-2818</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rev. Devadosan Sugirtharaj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://journeyonline.com.au/?p=22711#comment-2818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The theological and cognitive understanding of &#039;Uniting&#039; is crystal clear as Rev.Janet Staines mentions in her article. The ecumenical movement of Uniting was dramatic and inspiring 40 years back. The functional part of uniting is not same as in 1977. We are less focused on uniting churches to become one. Instead we are more focused on social issues working with other churches. Do we shift our focus as we celebrate our 40th birthday? If uniting is our DNA, what kind of progress we have made in uniting churches beyond three? Are we inward looking to keep our identity or we willing to give up our identity for uniting churches? Is our theological and governmental structures of Uniting church a catalyst to unite churches or a stumbling block to do it? These questions are raised when I read this article. Good reading!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theological and cognitive understanding of &#8216;Uniting&#8217; is crystal clear as Rev.Janet Staines mentions in her article. The ecumenical movement of Uniting was dramatic and inspiring 40 years back. The functional part of uniting is not same as in 1977. We are less focused on uniting churches to become one. Instead we are more focused on social issues working with other churches. Do we shift our focus as we celebrate our 40th birthday? If uniting is our DNA, what kind of progress we have made in uniting churches beyond three? Are we inward looking to keep our identity or we willing to give up our identity for uniting churches? Is our theological and governmental structures of Uniting church a catalyst to unite churches or a stumbling block to do it? These questions are raised when I read this article. Good reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
